Skip to content
AU | Americans United logo
DONATE
  • Home
  • About Us

    About AU | Mission and Values

    FAQ

    History

    Our Team

    Board of Directors

    Faith Advisory Council

    Careers

    Contact Us

  • Our Work
    KEY ISSUES

    Our Work

    Separation of Church and State 101

    Public Education

    LGBTQ+ Equality & Religious Discrimination

    Reproductive Freedom

    Civil Rights & Religious Freedom

    Fighting Christian Nationalism

    Legal & Policy Advocacy

    Court Cases

    Bill Tracker

    Report a Violation

    EDUCATION & RESOURCES
    Toolkits and Resources
  • Take Action
    FEATURED ACTION

    Urge Your State Legislators to Protect Church-State Separation

    Get Involved

    Join AU

    Events & Webinars

    Youth Activism

    Protest Signs and Resources

  • News & Media
    FEATURED ARTICLE

    What an officially ‘Christian nation’ looked like in America

    November 4, 2025
    Rob Boston

    News & Media

    Press Statements

    Church-State Separation Blog

    Church & State Magazine

  • Press
Report a Violation
  • DONATE

    Donate

    Give Monthly

    Planned Giving

    Renew Your Membership

    Support AU’s Legal Fund

    More Ways to Give

    Donation FAQs

September 2025 Church & State Magazine

Federal courts strike down school Ten Commandments displays in Arkansas and Texas

September 2, 2025
STAY INFORMED
Stay up to date on the latest on religious freedom. Subscribe now.

Two federal courts ruled last month that public schools in Arkansas and Texas may not implement new laws that require all public schools to permanently display a government-chosen, Protestant version of the Ten Commandments in classrooms. 


U.S. District Court Judge Timothy Brooks issued a preliminary injunction Aug. 4 holding that Arkansas Act 573, which was due to take effect on Aug. 5, “is plainly unconstitutional” under the religious freedom provisions of the Constitution’s First Amendment. 


The legal challenge, Stinson v. Fayetteville School District No. 1, was brought by Americans United, the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, the national ACLU and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel. The groups represent parents, students and clergy who charge that the law violated their rights. 


Ruling that the law would lead to unconstitutional religious coercion of the child plaintiffs and interfere with their parents’ rights to direct their children’s religious education, Brooks explained, “Students receiving instruction in algebra, physics, engineering, accounting, computer science, woodworking, fashion design and German will do so in classrooms that prominently display (the King James version of) the Ten Commandments. Every day from kindergarten to twelfth grade, children will be confronted with these Commandments — or face civil penalties for missing school.” 


The decision also sounded an alarm against growing state efforts to “experiment” with government establishments of religion. As Brooks observed, “Why would Arkansas pass an obviously unconstitutional law? Most likely because the State is part of a coordinated strategy among several states to inject Christian religious doctrine into public-school classrooms.” 


Americans United applauded the ruling. 


“Today’s decision will ensure that Arkansas families — not politicians or public-school officials — get to decide how and when their children engage with religion,” said Rachel Laser, president and CEO of Americans United. “It sends a strong message across the country that the government respects the religious freedom of every student in our public schools.” 


The day after ruling came down, Americans United and its allies sent a letter to superintendents in all Arkansas school districts, warning them not to implement Act 573. 


About two weeks later, a federal court in Texas invalidated that state’s law requiring the posting of the Ten Commandments in public schools.


“[T]he displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State’s favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school,” wrote U.S. District Judge Fred Biery in his Aug. 20 ruling.


The legal challenge, Rabbi Nathan v. Alamo Heights Independent School District, was brought on behalf of a group of Christian, Jewish, Hindu, Unitarian Universalist and nonreligious families, including clergy, with children in public schools by Americans United, the American Civil Liberties Union of Texas, the ACLU and the Freedom From Religion Foundation, with Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP serving as pro bono counsel.


“As a rabbi and public school parent, I welcome this ruling,” said plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan. “Children’s religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools.”


PREVIOUS

NEXT UP

Responsive Form

STAY INFORMED

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin Youtube

Americans United for Separation of Church and State is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit educational and advocacy organization that brings together people of all religions and none to protect the right of everyone to believe as they want — and stop anyone from using their beliefs to harm others. We fight in the courts, legislatures, and the public square for freedom without favor and equality without exception.

1310 L Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005

(202) 466-3234
Contact Us

State Nonprofit Disclosures 

Privacy Policy

Financial Information

State Nonprofit Disclosures      Privacy Policy     Financial Information

“Americans United for Separation of Church and State,” “Americans United” and “Church & State” are registered trademarks of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

© 2025 Americans United for Separation of Church and State. All rights reserved.
BBB Logo
Charity_Navigator_2024_Logo_AU_Navy
Candid Seal Platinum Transparency 2025

Website powered by:

Erawatech - Make peace with technology