Skip to content
AU | Americans United logo
DONATE
  • Home
  • About Us

    About AU | Mission and Values

    FAQ

    History

    Our Team

    Board of Directors

    Faith Advisory Council

    Careers

    Contact Us

  • Our Work
    KEY ISSUES

    Our Work

    Separation of Church and State 101

    Public Education

    LGBTQ+ Equality & Religious Discrimination

    Reproductive Freedom

    Civil Rights & Religious Freedom

    Fighting Christian Nationalism

    Legal & Policy Advocacy

    Court Cases

    Bill Tracker

    Report a Violation

    EDUCATION & RESOURCES
    Toolkits and Resources
  • Take Action
    FEATURED ACTION

    Urge Your State Legislators to Protect Church-State Separation

    Get Involved

    Join AU

    Events & Webinars

    Youth Activism

    Protest Signs and Resources

  • News & Media
    FEATURED ARTICLE

    What an officially ‘Christian nation’ looked like in America

    November 4, 2025
    Rob Boston

    News & Media

    Press Statements

    Church-State Separation Blog

    Church & State Magazine

  • Press
Report a Violation
  • DONATE

    Donate

    Give Monthly

    Planned Giving

    Renew Your Membership

    Support AU’s Legal Fund

    More Ways to Give

    Donation FAQs

Van Orden v. Perry

Last modified 2011.09.15

STATUS

Closed

TYPE

Amicus

COURT

U.S. Supreme Court

ISSUES

Religious Displays, Religious Minorities

CASE DOCUMENTS

No case documents found.

This was a challenge to a Fraternal Order of Eagles Ten Commandments monument placed in 1961 on the grounds of the Texas Capitol building. The 20-acre grounds contain sixteen other monuments, many of them memorials to Texas’ war-dead. The district court and the Fifth Circuit upheld the display, and the Supreme Court accepted the plaintiff’s request for a writ of certiorari.

In November 2004 AU, joined by allied groups, filed an amicus brief urging the Supreme Court to strike down the display as unconstitutional. We argued that the longevity of a display, and the lack of a prior legal challenge to it, should bear no relevance to a display’s constitutionality.

The Court disagreed, however. In a decision issued June 27, 2005, a plurality of the Court (Justices Rehnquist, Scalia, Thomas, and Kennedy) took the position that the display is a proper recognition of God. Justice Breyer provided the crucial fifth vote to uphold the monument, but he employed much narrower reasoning than the plurality. He opined that the monument is permissible because it is joined by other items, it was donated by an organization with secular motivations, and it had not been the subject of a legal challenge in its 40-year history. Four Justices (Stevens, Ginsburg, O’Connor, and Souter) dissented in three separate opinions, arguing among other things that the display is not neutral among religions.

Related to this case

Responsive Form

STAY INFORMED

Facebook-f Instagram Linkedin Youtube

Americans United for Separation of Church and State is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit educational and advocacy organization that brings together people of all religions and none to protect the right of everyone to believe as they want — and stop anyone from using their beliefs to harm others. We fight in the courts, legislatures, and the public square for freedom without favor and equality without exception.

1310 L Street NW, Suite 200
Washington, DC 20005

(202) 466-3234
Contact Us

State Nonprofit Disclosures 

Privacy Policy

Financial Information

State Nonprofit Disclosures      Privacy Policy     Financial Information

“Americans United for Separation of Church and State,” “Americans United” and “Church & State” are registered trademarks of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

© 2025 Americans United for Separation of Church and State. All rights reserved.
BBB Logo
Charity_Navigator_2024_Logo_AU_Navy
Candid Seal Platinum Transparency 2025

Website powered by:

Erawatech - Make peace with technology
Sign up for Emails
Responsive Form

JOIN THE MOVEMENT TO PROTECT RELIGIOUS FREEDOM